![]() Many of the same members and pundits continued to mock the Durham investigation even after his first indictment. Attorney Durham, raising additional concerns about the legitimacy of his appointment and work.” However, in 2020 they wanted to kill any report by Durham: “In addition, it remains unclear what rules and authority permit the public release of a ‘report’ by U.S. These were the same members demanding not just the release of the Mueller report but some even wanted the release of the unredacted report ( including grand jury information that cannot be publicly disclosed absent a court order). Notably, the letter from the senators in 2020 raised one of the greatest concerns for Democrats about this investigation: any Special Counsel report. ![]() Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.). Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), sent a letter to Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to demand the investigation of Durham as a possible political shill. On the campaign trail, Biden also dismissed the “investigation of the investigators.” I would presume the next attorney general will look to see if there is any merit to the work that John Durham is doing.” He added “The appointment is not consistent with the language of the statute that he’s relying on and can be rescinded, I think, by the next attorney general. Schiff raised the termination of the Durham investigation by Attorney General Garland before Durham could issue any indictments or reports. He resisted demands from Trump to issue a report before the election. Schiff denounced the Durham investigation as a “politically motivated” effort despite the fact that Durham suspended any public actions before the election to avoid even the appearance of political manipulation. This also included any continued investigation of the Hunter Biden scandal. Schiff told MSNBC that ongoing investigations would constitute “tearing down our democracy” and would serve as a way to “delegitimize” a president. Judging from the three indictments by Durham, it is now clear why Democrats sought to kill the investigation. Schiff opposed Durham while insisting that Mueller should be allowed to continue his own investigation. In 2017, American intelligence said that it believed that the dossier may have been used by Russian intelligence to spread disinformation. Schiff however has never produced that evidence.ĭurham has now shown how Clinton associates engineered the scandal and may have even been the true sources for the most salacious details in the dossier. Schiff previously claimed that he had direct evidence of collusion in his Committee despite Mueller finding no such evidence to support criminal charges. The recent investigations, of course, disprove those attacks by detailing new evidence of a coordinated and concerted effort by the Clinton campaign to create this scandal. Members and legal experts lined up to claim that there was nothing to be found and that Mueller had already revealed all that needed to be known about the scandal. There was a constant barrage of ridicule and abuse for those writing on the investigation. I have been writing about the Durham investigation for two years and the need to look into serious questions linking Clinton associates with the advancement of false claims of collusion. If it had been left to Schiff, there would have been no John Durham and no Durham indictments. It was a curious statement from someone who attacked the appointment of the Special Counsel and, with other leading Democrats, did his level best to kill the investigation. It is a crime to lie to federal investigators). ![]() ![]() Schiff surprisingly declared “First of all, whoever lied to the FBI or Christopher Steele should be prosecuted, and they are.” (It is actually not a crime to lie to Christopher Steele under 18 U.S.C. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was confronted with his relentless promoting of the now debunked Steele dossier in prior years. In a bizarre exchange this week with former State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus, Rep. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |